It shall be unlawful and constitute a Class 1 misdemeanor for any employer or any person acting as an agent for an employer, or any person who, for a fee, refers an alien who cannot provide documents indicating that he or she is legally eligible for employment in the United States for employment to an employer, or an officer, agent or representative of a labor organization to knowingly employ, continue to employ, or refer for employment any alien who cannot provide documents indicating that he or she is legally eligible for employment in the United States.

While the law does not require an employer to use an employment application, an employer who chooses to use an employment application must ask prospective employees if they are legally eligible to work in the United States.

To view the complete text of this statute, follow links to the Code of Virginia at this site.

At issue were two "irreconcilable" EEOC policies. The EEOC's Compliance Manual allowed the EEOC to disclose confidential information to plaintiffs or other third parties without notifying the submitter in advance of the disclosure. By contrast, the EEOC's regulations implementing the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) prohibited the EEOC from disclosing confidential information to third parties without notifying the submitter before the disclosure.

The Court held as follows:

[W]e remand this case to the district court to enjoin the Commission from disclosing Venetian’s confidential information without adhering to the notice and other requirements of the agency’s regulations implementing the FOIA. The EEOC's policy of permitting disclosure of confidential information without notifying the submitter is "arbitrary and capricious" in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) because the discloser without notification policy is inconsistent with the EEOC's own policies under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), which require notification to a submitter before any confidential or other information is disclosed. If and when the EEOC provides an adequate justification for the conflict between its policies, the injunction may be dissolved.

The practical upshot is that unless the EEOC provides a coherent rationale reconciling its inconsistent pre-disclosure notification policies, the EEOC must notify the employer in this case before disclosing the employer's confidential information. Going forward, in cases where the EEOC cannot provide a coherent rationale to deviate from the pre-disclosure notification requirements in its FOIA regulations, this decision provides support for the argument that an employer (or other submitter of confidential information to the EEOC) must be notified before the EEOC releases such information to a plaintiff or other third party.

From the perspective of this writer, who represents employers before the EEOC and has handled FOIA matters involving various federal agencies, this outcome seems fair and balanced.

In general, undue hardship means an action that requires significant difficulty or expense, when considered in light of these factors:

(i) the nature and cost of the accommodation needed under the ADA;

(ii) the overall financial resources of the facility or facilities involved in the provision of the reasonable accommodation; the number of persons employed at such facility; the effect on expenses and resources, or the impact otherwise of such accommodation upon the operation of the facility;

(iii) the overall financial resources of the covered entity; the overall size of the business of a covered entity with respect to the number of its employees; the number, type, and location of its facilities; and

(iv) the type of operation or operations of the covered entity, including the composition, structure, and functions of the workforce of such entity; the geographic separateness, administrative, or fiscal relationship of the facility or facilities in question to the covered
entity.

The ADA prohibits employment discrimination against "a qualified individual with a disability" because of the disability in regard to job application procedures, hiring, promotion, discharge, compensation, training, or other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment. The ADA also governs medical examinations and disability-related inquiries.

Covered Employers. The ADA applies to education instutitions, state, local, and private-sector employers with 15 or more employees; employment agencies; labor organizations; and joint labor management committees. It does not apply to the federal government or private membership clubs (other than a labor organization). Coverage of multinational employers depends on a variety of factors, as explained here by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

The Virginia Human Rights Act prohibits discrimination because of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions, age, marital status, or disability.

In Woods v. Prudential Ins. Co., No. 07-1580 (June 11, 2008), the Fourth Circuit concluded that the trial court erroneously applied the "abuse-of-discretion" standard of review to plaintiff's ERISA claim instead of the more rigorous "de novo" standard of review to determine whether the plan administrator properly denied plaintiff's benefit claim.

In Teshome-Gebreegziabher v. Mukasey, No. 08-1060 (June 16, 2008), the Fourth Circuit clarified that the "clear and convincing" standard of review applies to an immigrant's motion to stay deportation.

This case serves as a reminder to federal contractors and subcontractors in Virginia, the District of Columbia, and nationwide that it is important to screen your screening tools to eliminate the potential for claims of sex, gender or other forms of employment discrimination.

While the outcome of this case remains to be seen, an important take-away for employers is that it is critically important to develop, implement, and communicate to employees specific procedures to respond to workplace threats.

What are elaws? According to DOL, "The elaws advisors are free, Web-based tools designed to help employers and workers understand the department's major employment laws. By asking a series of questions, the advisors simulate a conversation with a Department of Labor expert and guide users to customized information explaining the requirements of each law. By asking questions such as size of business, location and type of industry through multiple choice or yes and no questions, the FirstStep Employment Law Overview Advisor determines which federal employment laws apply to each user. The advisor then provides information from the Labor Department's Employment Law Guide on the basic provisions of these laws."

Elaws are available at www.dol.gov/elaws/firststep.

In the wake of these multi-million dollar judgments and settlements, the EEOC issued a fact sheet to assist employers in understanding how to avoid employment discrimination claims based on tests and other selection criteria.

The DC Human Rights Act prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin. sex, age, marital status, personal appearance, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, family responsibilities, genetic information, disability, matriculation, or political affiliation.

The FMLA permits eligible employees of covered employers to take up to 12 weeks of job-protected, unpaid leave during any 12-month period. The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for FY 2008 amends the FMLA to provide for additional categories of job-protected leave relating to members of the military.